[panel panel-style="transparent" title="COMMUNITY%20DEVELOPMENT" sub-title="COMPLETED%20SPENDING%20REVIEWS%20" title-size="20" separator-color="primary"]
[accordions title-text-size="14px" icon-close="ion-ios-arrow-up" icon-open="ion-ios-arrow-down"]
[accordion title="Assessment%20of%20the%20Biofuels%20Incentive%20Model"]
"A SR was commissioned to estimate the costs and test the robustness of the incentives that had been proposed for stimulating bio-fuels production in SA. The review concluded that the proposed scheme was deficient in a number of respects, making it both more expensive than initially anticipated and more generous to producers than it needed to be. The SR identified weaknesses in the conceptualisation of the incentive scheme. These included:
The inappropriateness of guaranteeing a 15% return on assets rather than on equity, especially when claw-back provisions kick in only after actual returns exceed 20%;
The inappropriateness of allowing “incentive double-dipping” by allowing subsidised firms to qualify for accelerated depreciation incentives; and
A lack of clarity about whether incentives should be paid on biofuel produced or biofuel delivered to refineries.
In addition, the SR identified numerous weaknesses in the model that had been generated to estimate the cost of the biofuel incentive that collectively made it unsuitable for policy purposes. Reworking the numbers, the SR estimates that the cost of the biofuel incentive will be substantially higher than that projected in the original model."
[files-list icon-size="1" separator="none" spacing="thin" default-icon="file-excel-o"]
[file-list-item shortpoint_connection="%7B%22id%22%3A%22sharePointList%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22siteCollection%22%3A%22%2F%22%2C%22source%22%3A%22Spending%2520Reviews%2520Resources%22%2C%22view%22%3A%22Biofuels%20Community%22%2C%22itemsLimit%22%3A0%2C%22itemsQueryViewFieldsTypes%22%3A%7B%22Edit%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A12%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Computed%22%7D%2C%22DocIcon%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A12%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Computed%22%7D%2C%22LinkFilename%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A12%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Computed%22%7D%2C%22Function_x0020_Group%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A6%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Choice%22%7D%2C%22Spending_x0020_Review_x0020_Type%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A6%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Choice%22%7D%2C%22PER_x0020_Category%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A6%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Choice%22%7D%2C%22PER_x0020_Sub_x002d_Category%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A6%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Choice%22%7D%2C%22Document_x0020_Type%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A6%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Choice%22%7D%2C%22Modified%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A4%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22DateTime%22%7D%2C%22Editor%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A20%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22User%22%7D%2C%22FileSizeDisplay%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A12%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Computed%22%7D%2C%22Title%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A2%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Text%22%7D%7D%2C%22itemsQueryExtraFields%22%3A%5B%22FileRef%22%2C%22BaseName%22%5D%2C%22listInfo%22%3A%7B%22isDocumentLibrary%22%3Atrue%2C%22isDiscussionList%22%3Afalse%2C%22isPublishingPages%22%3Afalse%2C%22isExternalList%22%3Afalse%2C%22defaultDisplayFormUrl%22%3A%22%2Fpepa%2FFunctionGroupTemplate%2FForms%2FDispForm.aspx%22%7D%2C%22queryText%22%3A%22%3CView%20Scope%3D'RecursiveAll'%3E%3CQuery%3E%3COrderBy%3E%3CFieldRef%20Name%3D%5C%22FileLeafRef%5C%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2FOrderBy%3E%3CWhere%3E%3CAnd%3E%3CEq%3E%3CFieldRef%20Name%3D%5C%22PER_x0020_Sub_x002d_Category%5C%22%20%2F%3E%3CValue%20Type%3D%5C%22Text%5C%22%3EBiofuels%3C%2FValue%3E%3C%2FEq%3E%3CEq%3E%3CFieldRef%20Name%3D%5C%22PER_x0020_Category%5C%22%20%2F%3E%3CValue%20Type%3D%5C%22Text%5C%22%3ECommunity%20Development%3C%2FValue%3E%3C%2FEq%3E%3C%2FAnd%3E%3C%2FWhere%3E%3C%2FQuery%3E%3CRowLimit%3E30%3C%2FRowLimit%3E%3C%2FView%3E%22%7D%2C%22caching%22%3Anull%7D" title="%23Title" file-type="%23DocIcon" link="%23FileRef" linking="new-window" /]
[/files-list]
[/accordion]
[accordion title="Housing%20Programmes%20Comparison"]
The study shows that only 123 000 housing units are delivered per year, significantly fewer than the national Department of Housing’s published number of 254 000 units. The full cost of an RDP house (top structure and local reticulation) is calculated at R153 000, as against a subsidy of just R90 000 at the time of the study. The additional costs are largely met from municipal infrastructure funding and other spending programmes, while the mobilisation of private finance is insufficient. Census data suggests that about 2 million households did not have adequate housing in 2011. At the present pace of delivery, it would take 30 years to eradicate this backlog using the RDP and informal settlement model of delivery. Should delivery continue within the current policy parameters, the cost of eradicating the backlog over ten years would be R600 billion (or R60 billion per year). However, as current spending is only R15 billion per year, such a significant increase does not seem feasible.
[files-list icon-size="1" separator="none" spacing="thin" default-icon="file-excel-o"]
[file-list-item shortpoint_connection="%7B%22id%22%3A%22sharePointList%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22siteCollection%22%3A%22%2F%22%2C%22source%22%3A%22Spending%2520Reviews%2520Resources%22%2C%22view%22%3A%22Housing%20Programmatic%20Comparison%22%2C%22itemsLimit%22%3A0%2C%22itemsQueryViewFieldsTypes%22%3A%7B%22Edit%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A12%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Computed%22%7D%2C%22DocIcon%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A12%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Computed%22%7D%2C%22LinkFilename%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A12%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Computed%22%7D%2C%22Function_x0020_Group%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A6%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Choice%22%7D%2C%22Spending_x0020_Review_x0020_Type%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A6%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Choice%22%7D%2C%22PER_x0020_Category%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A6%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Choice%22%7D%2C%22PER_x0020_Sub_x002d_Category%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A6%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Choice%22%7D%2C%22Document_x0020_Type%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A6%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Choice%22%7D%2C%22Modified%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A4%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22DateTime%22%7D%2C%22Editor%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A20%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22User%22%7D%2C%22FileSizeDisplay%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A12%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Computed%22%7D%2C%22Title%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A2%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Text%22%7D%7D%2C%22itemsQueryExtraFields%22%3A%5B%22FileRef%22%2C%22BaseName%22%5D%2C%22listInfo%22%3A%7B%22isDocumentLibrary%22%3Atrue%2C%22isDiscussionList%22%3Afalse%2C%22isPublishingPages%22%3Afalse%2C%22isExternalList%22%3Afalse%2C%22defaultDisplayFormUrl%22%3A%22%2Fpepa%2FFunctionGroupTemplate%2FForms%2FDispForm.aspx%22%7D%2C%22queryText%22%3A%22%3CView%20Scope%3D'RecursiveAll'%3E%3CQuery%3E%3COrderBy%3E%3CFieldRef%20Name%3D%5C%22FileLeafRef%5C%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2FOrderBy%3E%3CWhere%3E%3CEq%3E%3CFieldRef%20Name%3D%5C%22PER_x0020_Sub_x002d_Category%5C%22%20%2F%3E%3CValue%20Type%3D%5C%22Text%5C%22%3EHousing%20Programmatic%20Comparison%3C%2FValue%3E%3C%2FEq%3E%3C%2FWhere%3E%3C%2FQuery%3E%3CRowLimit%3E30%3C%2FRowLimit%3E%3C%2FView%3E%22%7D%2C%22caching%22%3Anull%7D" title="%23Title" file-type="%23DocIcon" link="%23FileRef" linking="new-window" /]
[/files-list]
[/accordion]
[accordion title="Housing%20Rental%20Stock%20-%20Provincial%20Goverment"]
"Provincial government have two stocks of rental accommodation: one managed by Public Works and which accommodates government employees; one managed by Human Settlements for ordinary citizens. Public Works provide rental accommodation at low monthly rentals for occupants who are also mostly government employees earning an income. There are about 6600 of these units across the country. OSRational shortfalls in the provincial public works portfolio are covered by provincial governments’ budget allocations and represents a significant subsidy to the occupants estimated to be worth nearly R5,000 SR household relative to market rents. Occupants should be able to afford to pay for their accommodation on terms that are not highly subsidised, especially as public servants receive a housing allowance. The arrangement is not sustainable or equitable. However, any attempt to change these arrangements is met with opposition from government employees. Human Settlements departments inherited a stock of provincial government-owned units that has largely been sold off or handed over to occupants. A small portfolio of more problematic units -- about 6,000 in total -- remains in the books of five provinces. These are rented out at low rates, and collection rates are poor, leading to a gap between costs and revenues of about R100 million in 2016/17. This creates an individual subsidy to the beneficiary far greater than the subsidy provided in any of the other housing programmes. The policy equity argument does not hold for this stock. Overall, it is unsustainable to continue to manage the stock as rental stock and for provincial departments to continue to act as management agents."
[files-list icon-size="1" separator="none" spacing="thin" default-icon="file-excel-o"]
[file-list-item shortpoint_connection="%7B%22id%22%3A%22sharePointList%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22siteCollection%22%3A%22%2F%22%2C%22source%22%3A%22Spending%2520Reviews%2520Resources%22%2C%22view%22%3A%22Public%20Residential%20Rental%20Stock%22%2C%22itemsLimit%22%3A0%2C%22itemsQueryViewFieldsTypes%22%3A%7B%22Edit%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A12%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Computed%22%7D%2C%22DocIcon%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A12%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Computed%22%7D%2C%22LinkFilename%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A12%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Computed%22%7D%2C%22Function_x0020_Group%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A6%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Choice%22%7D%2C%22Spending_x0020_Review_x0020_Type%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A6%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Choice%22%7D%2C%22PER_x0020_Category%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A6%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Choice%22%7D%2C%22PER_x0020_Sub_x002d_Category%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A6%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Choice%22%7D%2C%22Document_x0020_Type%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A6%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Choice%22%7D%2C%22Modified%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A4%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22DateTime%22%7D%2C%22Editor%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A20%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22User%22%7D%2C%22FileSizeDisplay%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A12%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Computed%22%7D%2C%22Title%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A2%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Text%22%7D%7D%2C%22itemsQueryExtraFields%22%3A%5B%22FileRef%22%2C%22BaseName%22%5D%2C%22listInfo%22%3A%7B%22isDocumentLibrary%22%3Atrue%2C%22isDiscussionList%22%3Afalse%2C%22isPublishingPages%22%3Afalse%2C%22isExternalList%22%3Afalse%2C%22defaultDisplayFormUrl%22%3A%22%2Fpepa%2FFunctionGroupTemplate%2FForms%2FDispForm.aspx%22%7D%2C%22queryText%22%3A%22%3CView%20Scope%3D'RecursiveAll'%3E%3CQuery%3E%3COrderBy%3E%3CFieldRef%20Name%3D%5C%22FileLeafRef%5C%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2FOrderBy%3E%3CWhere%3E%3CEq%3E%3CFieldRef%20Name%3D%5C%22PER_x0020_Sub_x002d_Category%5C%22%20%2F%3E%3CValue%20Type%3D%5C%22Text%5C%22%3EPublic%20Residential%20Rental%20Stock%3C%2FValue%3E%3C%2FEq%3E%3C%2FWhere%3E%3C%2FQuery%3E%3CRowLimit%3E30%3C%2FRowLimit%3E%3C%2FView%3E%22%7D%2C%22caching%22%3Anull%7D" title="%23Title" file-type="%23DocIcon" link="%23FileRef" linking="new-window" /]
[/files-list]
[/accordion]
[accordion title="Provincial%20Office%20Rental%20Accommodation"]"In 2016/17, Provincial Governments collectively leased 1.2 million m2 of office accommodation at an average cost of R 120 /m2 per month -- at a total cost of R151 million month/R1.8 billion per year. Most of lease expenditure (85%) were in the major economic centres of the provinces, where average costs are R125/m2 for leases of offices that averaged 5,400m2 in size. Elsewhere, leases tend to be considerably smaller. Departments in Government’s social cluster accounts for more than 50% of the leased space. These leases tend to be larger offices- over 2,000m2 - and primarily in CBDs & Main Centres, at an average rental of R126/m2. Leases for departments in the Economic and Governance clusters are for between 1,500 – 1,600m2 at an average R120/m2. Just over 20% of the total rental expenditure is on leases that have expired and are running on a month-to-month. Based on market benchmarks, it is estimated that about a third of monthly expenditure is on leases the cost of which is above market norms. Most of the expenditure above market is in the CBD and Main Centres, and just under 90% of the expenditure above market was in 6 provinces. Just under 80% of these lease in the CBD & Main Centre that are above market. A lease maturity analysis was not conclusive in providing a correlation of mature leases and rentals above market. Potential savings were estimated to be in the range of R600 million to R1.2 billion over three years."Artisan training has been revived from a low of 4 500 artisans in 2005 to nearly 15 000 in 2013, at a cost to government of just over R4 billion a year. The National Development Plan sets a target of 30 000 artisans a year by 2030, and expenditure is set to increase to over R5 billion by 2016 and nearly R6 billion by 2018. The low throughput rate of 56% remains the biggest obstacle facing the artisan development system. Currently about 27 000 artisan learners enter the system each year, but fewer than 15 000 qualify. The system consists of multiple routes, many of which are complex and do not optimally integrate theoretical, practical and workplace knowledge and exSRience. Public TVET colleges face a number of challenges in providing artisan programmes, including significant capacity constraints, a curriculum that is not aligned with the outcomes of trades and local economic needs, uneven levels of trade exSRtise among teachers, and inadequate work exSRience and employment opportunities for students. Significant investment cannot be avoided; there is no cheap way of training artisans. However, much better value for money can be obtained. The key is to improve the quality and capacity of the programmes so that the private sector regains confidence in the quality of graduates from public TVET colleges. The throughput rates also need to be improved to at least 75%; this would require a much more efficient and centrally managed system. Savings could also be achieved if public TVET colleges conducted more artisan training as part of occupational training programmes. If throughput rates could be improved, unit costs would come down and the expansion required to achieve NDP targets would become more viable and sustainable.
[files-list icon-size="1" separator="none" spacing="thin" default-icon="file-excel-o"]
[file-list-item shortpoint_connection="%7B%22id%22%3A%22sharePointList%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22siteCollection%22%3A%22%2F%22%2C%22source%22%3A%22Spending%2520Reviews%2520Resources%22%2C%22view%22%3A%22Provincial%20Office%20Rental%20Accommodation%22%2C%22itemsLimit%22%3A0%2C%22itemsQueryViewFieldsTypes%22%3A%7B%22Edit%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A12%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Computed%22%7D%2C%22DocIcon%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A12%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Computed%22%7D%2C%22LinkFilename%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A12%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Computed%22%7D%2C%22Function_x0020_Group%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A6%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Choice%22%7D%2C%22Spending_x0020_Review_x0020_Type%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A6%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Choice%22%7D%2C%22PER_x0020_Category%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A6%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Choice%22%7D%2C%22PER_x0020_Sub_x002d_Category%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A6%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Choice%22%7D%2C%22Document_x0020_Type%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A6%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Choice%22%7D%2C%22Modified%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A4%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22DateTime%22%7D%2C%22Editor%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A20%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22User%22%7D%2C%22FileSizeDisplay%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A12%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Computed%22%7D%2C%22Title%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A2%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Text%22%7D%7D%2C%22itemsQueryExtraFields%22%3A%5B%22FileRef%22%2C%22BaseName%22%5D%2C%22listInfo%22%3A%7B%22isDocumentLibrary%22%3Atrue%2C%22isDiscussionList%22%3Afalse%2C%22isPublishingPages%22%3Afalse%2C%22isExternalList%22%3Afalse%2C%22defaultDisplayFormUrl%22%3A%22%2Fpepa%2FFunctionGroupTemplate%2FForms%2FDispForm.aspx%22%7D%2C%22queryText%22%3A%22%3CView%20Scope%3D'RecursiveAll'%3E%3CQuery%3E%3COrderBy%3E%3CFieldRef%20Name%3D%5C%22FileLeafRef%5C%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2FOrderBy%3E%3CWhere%3E%3CEq%3E%3CFieldRef%20Name%3D%5C%22PER_x0020_Sub_x002d_Category%5C%22%20%2F%3E%3CValue%20Type%3D%5C%22Text%5C%22%3EProvincial%20Office%20Rental%20Accommodation%3C%2FValue%3E%3C%2FEq%3E%3C%2FWhere%3E%3C%2FQuery%3E%3CRowLimit%3E30%3C%2FRowLimit%3E%3C%2FView%3E%22%7D%2C%22caching%22%3Anull%7D" title="%23Title" file-type="%23DocIcon" link="%23FileRef" linking="new-window" /]
[/files-list]
[/accordion]
[accordion title="Public%20Transport%20System%20in%205%20Metros"]
"Total public and private expenditure on public transport services in South Africa’s six largest metropolitan areas amounts to about R26.2 billion per year. In financial terms, the minibus taxi industry is the largest of the services, with about half of total revenues. It is followed by commuter rail (18%), conventional buses (16%) and the Gautrain (9%). South Africa’s cities are characterised by population densities that are among the lowest in the world. One consequence of low density is long commutes, and another is that a relatively larger proportion of the gross geographic product of South African cities is spent on transport and logistics. The study finds that the current institutional architecture is sub-optimal and uncoordinated. Municipalities are responsible for land use planning; PRASA manages commuter rail services; and provinces contract subsidised bus services and regulate operating licenses (mostly for minibus taxis). In addition, the National Land Transport Act tasked the 12 largest municipalities with implementing BRT, financed by conditional grants. As a result, operators’ interests prevail over those of municipalities and commuters. Revisiting this institutional architecture is critical to improving system-wide performance. Because such a sizeable proportion of public transport in the six largest metros is provided by minibus taxis, enhancing this sector could yield significant benefits. However, the competitiveness of the minibus taxi sector depends in part on its informal character, and increased regulation and formalisation could raise costs without raising productivity. Ultimately, optimising transport-related spending would require considerable investment in reshaping and densifying cities. Without such investment, public transport will remain expensive for both users and government, because of its long distances, high peak demand, minimal off-peak use, and unidirectional travel patterns. Addressing these patterns must be the primary goal of planning both public transport and land use."
[files-list icon-size="1" separator="none" spacing="thin" default-icon="file-excel-o"]
[file-list-item shortpoint_connection="%7B%22id%22%3A%22sharePointList%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22siteCollection%22%3A%22%2F%22%2C%22source%22%3A%22Spending%2520Reviews%2520Resources%22%2C%22view%22%3A%22Public%20Transport%20in%20Metros%22%2C%22itemsLimit%22%3A0%2C%22itemsQueryViewFieldsTypes%22%3A%7B%22Edit%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A12%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Computed%22%7D%2C%22DocIcon%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A12%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Computed%22%7D%2C%22LinkFilename%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A12%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Computed%22%7D%2C%22Function_x0020_Group%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A6%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Choice%22%7D%2C%22Spending_x0020_Review_x0020_Type%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A6%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Choice%22%7D%2C%22PER_x0020_Category%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A6%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Choice%22%7D%2C%22PER_x0020_Sub_x002d_Category%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A6%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Choice%22%7D%2C%22Document_x0020_Type%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A6%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Choice%22%7D%2C%22Modified%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A4%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22DateTime%22%7D%2C%22Editor%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A20%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22User%22%7D%2C%22FileSizeDisplay%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A12%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Computed%22%7D%2C%22Title%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A2%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Text%22%7D%7D%2C%22itemsQueryExtraFields%22%3A%5B%22FileRef%22%2C%22BaseName%22%5D%2C%22listInfo%22%3A%7B%22isDocumentLibrary%22%3Atrue%2C%22isDiscussionList%22%3Afalse%2C%22isPublishingPages%22%3Afalse%2C%22isExternalList%22%3Afalse%2C%22defaultDisplayFormUrl%22%3A%22%2Fpepa%2FFunctionGroupTemplate%2FForms%2FDispForm.aspx%22%7D%2C%22queryText%22%3A%22%3CView%20Scope%3D'RecursiveAll'%3E%3CQuery%3E%3COrderBy%3E%3CFieldRef%20Name%3D%5C%22FileLeafRef%5C%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2FOrderBy%3E%3CWhere%3E%3CEq%3E%3CFieldRef%20Name%3D%5C%22PER_x0020_Sub_x002d_Category%5C%22%20%2F%3E%3CValue%20Type%3D%5C%22Text%5C%22%3EPublic%20Transport%20in%20Metros%3C%2FValue%3E%3C%2FEq%3E%3C%2FWhere%3E%3C%2FQuery%3E%3CRowLimit%3E30%3C%2FRowLimit%3E%3C%2FView%3E%22%7D%2C%22caching%22%3Anull%7D" title="%23Title" file-type="%23DocIcon" link="%23FileRef" linking="new-window" /]
[/files-list]
[/accordion]
[accordion title="Rapid%20Verification%20of%20Informal%20Settlements"]A rapid assessment of the upgrading of informal settlements found only 240 000 upgrades, as against the claimed delivery of 400 000 upgrades.
[files-list icon-size="1" separator="none" spacing="thin" default-icon="file-excel-o"]
[file-list-item shortpoint_connection="%7B%22id%22%3A%22sharePointList%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22siteCollection%22%3A%22%2F%22%2C%22source%22%3A%22Spending%2520Reviews%2520Resources%22%2C%22view%22%3A%22Rapid%20Verification%20of%20Informal%20Settlements%22%2C%22itemsLimit%22%3A0%2C%22itemsQueryViewFieldsTypes%22%3A%7B%22Edit%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A12%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Computed%22%7D%2C%22DocIcon%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A12%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Computed%22%7D%2C%22LinkFilename%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A12%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Computed%22%7D%2C%22Function_x0020_Group%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A6%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Choice%22%7D%2C%22Spending_x0020_Review_x0020_Type%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A6%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Choice%22%7D%2C%22PER_x0020_Category%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A6%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Choice%22%7D%2C%22PER_x0020_Sub_x002d_Category%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A6%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Choice%22%7D%2C%22Document_x0020_Type%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A6%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Choice%22%7D%2C%22Modified%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A4%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22DateTime%22%7D%2C%22Editor%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A20%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22User%22%7D%2C%22FileSizeDisplay%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A12%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Computed%22%7D%2C%22Title%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A2%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Text%22%7D%7D%2C%22itemsQueryExtraFields%22%3A%5B%22FileRef%22%2C%22BaseName%22%5D%2C%22listInfo%22%3A%7B%22isDocumentLibrary%22%3Atrue%2C%22isDiscussionList%22%3Afalse%2C%22isPublishingPages%22%3Afalse%2C%22isExternalList%22%3Afalse%2C%22defaultDisplayFormUrl%22%3A%22%2Fpepa%2FFunctionGroupTemplate%2FForms%2FDispForm.aspx%22%7D%2C%22queryText%22%3A%22%3CView%20Scope%3D'RecursiveAll'%3E%3CQuery%3E%3COrderBy%3E%3CFieldRef%20Name%3D%5C%22FileLeafRef%5C%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2FOrderBy%3E%3CWhere%3E%3CEq%3E%3CFieldRef%20Name%3D%5C%22PER_x0020_Sub_x002d_Category%5C%22%20%2F%3E%3CValue%20Type%3D%5C%22Text%5C%22%3ERapid%20Verification%20of%20Informal%20Settlements%3C%2FValue%3E%3C%2FEq%3E%3C%2FWhere%3E%3C%2FQuery%3E%3CRowLimit%3E30%3C%2FRowLimit%3E%3C%2FView%3E%22%7D%2C%22caching%22%3Anull%7D" title="%23Title" file-type="%23DocIcon" link="%23FileRef" linking="new-window" /]
[/files-list]
[/accordion]
[accordion title="Social%20Housing%20Funding%20Model"]
"The key constraint identified in the study is that current policies have not created the right conditions for attracting significant participation by the private sector. Should these policies not be addressed, private sector participation in social housing is likely to remain limited and the sector to stay dependent on public funding and special financing arrangements through DFIs. Proposed policy changes include: § Increase the RCG quantum to compensate for the lack of annual escalation since 2008, and implement annual increases in line with inflation. § Raise the income bands of eligible tenants to compensate for the lack of indexation since 2008, and continue to index these in future. § Permit an annual increase in rental linked to the CPI. § Explore mechanisms to mitigate against political risk that could affect the viability of the project, e.g. a lack of political will to raise rents or evict defaulters."
[files-list icon-size="1" separator="none" spacing="thin" default-icon="file-excel-o"]
[file-list-item shortpoint_connection="%7B%22id%22%3A%22sharePointList%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22siteCollection%22%3A%22%2F%22%2C%22source%22%3A%22Spending%2520Reviews%2520Resources%22%2C%22view%22%3A%22Social%20Housing%22%2C%22itemsLimit%22%3A0%2C%22itemsQueryViewFieldsTypes%22%3A%7B%22Edit%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A12%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Computed%22%7D%2C%22DocIcon%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A12%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Computed%22%7D%2C%22LinkFilename%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A12%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Computed%22%7D%2C%22Function_x0020_Group%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A6%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Choice%22%7D%2C%22Spending_x0020_Review_x0020_Type%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A6%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Choice%22%7D%2C%22PER_x0020_Category%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A6%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Choice%22%7D%2C%22PER_x0020_Sub_x002d_Category%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A6%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Choice%22%7D%2C%22Document_x0020_Type%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A6%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Choice%22%7D%2C%22Modified%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A4%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22DateTime%22%7D%2C%22Editor%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A20%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22User%22%7D%2C%22FileSizeDisplay%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A12%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Computed%22%7D%2C%22Title%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A2%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Text%22%7D%7D%2C%22itemsQueryExtraFields%22%3A%5B%22FileRef%22%2C%22BaseName%22%5D%2C%22listInfo%22%3A%7B%22isDocumentLibrary%22%3Atrue%2C%22isDiscussionList%22%3Afalse%2C%22isPublishingPages%22%3Afalse%2C%22isExternalList%22%3Afalse%2C%22defaultDisplayFormUrl%22%3A%22%2Fpepa%2FFunctionGroupTemplate%2FForms%2FDispForm.aspx%22%7D%2C%22queryText%22%3A%22%3CView%20Scope%3D'RecursiveAll'%3E%3CQuery%3E%3COrderBy%3E%3CFieldRef%20Name%3D%5C%22FileLeafRef%5C%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2FOrderBy%3E%3CWhere%3E%3CEq%3E%3CFieldRef%20Name%3D%5C%22PER_x0020_Sub_x002d_Category%5C%22%20%2F%3E%3CValue%20Type%3D%5C%22Text%5C%22%3ESocial%20Housing%3C%2FValue%3E%3C%2FEq%3E%3C%2FWhere%3E%3C%2FQuery%3E%3CRowLimit%3E30%3C%2FRowLimit%3E%3C%2FView%3E%22%7D%2C%22caching%22%3Anull%7D" title="%23Title" file-type="%23DocIcon" link="%23FileRef" linking="new-window" /]
[/files-list]
[/accordion]
[accordion title="Water%20and%20Sanitation%20Value%20Chain"]
"Weak revenue management, a failure to bill consumers, low payment levels and ineffective debt collection undermine the financial sustainability of the water services sector. The shortfall, which averaged around 30% of total costs SR cubic meter, is unsustainable, as it is too large to be covered by the equitable share grant. Should non-revenue water be reduced to 25% through repairs, maintenance and the refurbishment of infrastructure, the four municipalities in the study could realise an additional R800 million SR year. Extrapolating this to the roughly R25 billion in revenue collected for water services in 2013/14 yields additional revenue of R5 billion SR year. Reducing non-revenue water to this extent would require major capital expenditure, but only a small increase in oSRating expenditure. Reporting on the condition of water services infrastructure assets is unsatisfactory. While legislation and regulations require asset condition to be monitored and action to be taken should the condition of an asset deteriorate below a certain threshold, in practice, the management of this activity needs to be improved."
[files-list icon-size="1" separator="none" spacing="thin" default-icon="file-excel-o"]
[file-list-item shortpoint_connection="%7B%22id%22%3A%22sharePointList%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22siteCollection%22%3A%22%2F%22%2C%22source%22%3A%22Spending%2520Reviews%2520Resources%22%2C%22view%22%3A%22Water%20Services%20Delivery%20Chain%22%2C%22itemsLimit%22%3A0%2C%22itemsQueryViewFieldsTypes%22%3A%7B%22Edit%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A12%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Computed%22%7D%2C%22DocIcon%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A12%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Computed%22%7D%2C%22LinkFilename%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A12%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Computed%22%7D%2C%22Function_x0020_Group%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A6%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Choice%22%7D%2C%22Spending_x0020_Review_x0020_Type%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A6%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Choice%22%7D%2C%22PER_x0020_Category%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A6%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Choice%22%7D%2C%22PER_x0020_Sub_x002d_Category%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A6%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Choice%22%7D%2C%22Document_x0020_Type%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A6%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Choice%22%7D%2C%22Modified%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A4%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22DateTime%22%7D%2C%22Editor%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A20%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22User%22%7D%2C%22FileSizeDisplay%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A12%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Computed%22%7D%2C%22Title%22%3A%7B%22fieldType%22%3A2%2C%22typeAsString%22%3A%22Text%22%7D%7D%2C%22itemsQueryExtraFields%22%3A%5B%22FileRef%22%2C%22BaseName%22%5D%2C%22listInfo%22%3A%7B%22isDocumentLibrary%22%3Atrue%2C%22isDiscussionList%22%3Afalse%2C%22isPublishingPages%22%3Afalse%2C%22isExternalList%22%3Afalse%2C%22defaultDisplayFormUrl%22%3A%22%2Fpepa%2FFunctionGroupTemplate%2FForms%2FDispForm.aspx%22%7D%2C%22queryText%22%3A%22%3CView%20Scope%3D'RecursiveAll'%3E%3CQuery%3E%3COrderBy%3E%3CFieldRef%20Name%3D%5C%22FileLeafRef%5C%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2FOrderBy%3E%3CWhere%3E%3CEq%3E%3CFieldRef%20Name%3D%5C%22PER_x0020_Sub_x002d_Category%5C%22%20%2F%3E%3CValue%20Type%3D%5C%22Text%5C%22%3EWater%20Services%20Delivery%20Chain%3C%2FValue%3E%3C%2FEq%3E%3C%2FWhere%3E%3C%2FQuery%3E%3CRowLimit%3E30%3C%2FRowLimit%3E%3C%2FView%3E%22%7D%2C%22caching%22%3Anull%7D" title="%23Title" file-type="%23DocIcon" link="%23FileRef" linking="new-window" /]
[/files-list]
[/accordion]
[/accordions]